3 ms·
This is a gray area for sure, but I'd argue that it violates the [HITECH Act][^1] Part D (privacy & disclosure). The rub here is that the patient, newborn in th
by johnbellone 4y ago
This is a gray area for sure, but I'd argue that it violates the [HITECH Act][^1] Part D (privacy & disclosure). The rub here is that the patient, newborn in this case, did not consent because they were underage. In many cases this blood sample is taken "by default" and requires an opt-out due to religious objection.
[^1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Information_Technology_for_Economic_and_Clinical_Health_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Information_Technology_...
- asdff 4y agoLegal guardians consented.
- pseudalopex 4y agoThe article said it's mandatory.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 4y agoWas the legal guardian served a warrant signed by a judge?
- pseudalopex 4y agoNot likely. Was this an indirect argument the mandate is unconstitutional?