AHHH GAWD i had to stop reading that to maintain my self respect. This guy does not know the meaning of "logic" and unbiased trials for comparison. In a nutsh

AHHH GAWD i had to stop reading that to maintain my self respect. This guy does not know the meaning of "logic" and unbiased trials for comparison. In a nutshell: He actually entered 'dance club' in google and was ANNOYED by the lack of RELEVANCE AND DETAIL. No no, rather than take .45 seconds to actually THINK about refining his search query to "popular dance clubs in miami" he proposes that THE SEARCH ENGINE should sift though all of his billions of "social utilities" to figure out he was planning a trip to miami and so OBVIOUSLY he was looking for "dance clubs in miami. But wait, there's more. His Google-killing idea further specifies that the results should list clubs that 'his friends' have recommended and like. So forget about putting "popular" in the search term, and forget that any NORMAL PERSON would just use yelp, no no no no the answer is to blame Google for its blatant disregard for peoples search stupidity and FIX EVERYTHING about your query, because you know...its brain is bigger than yours. duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Good god that was bad. Just for kicks, uh yeah, its called the semantic web, people are working on it, and uh no, you did not invent it. WOW