The WSJ is asking courts to act, not the WH: >Twitter is a private company. But evidence of a direct connection between White House pressure and Twitter censor

The WSJ is asking courts to act, not the WH: >Twitter is a private company. But evidence of a direct connection between White House pressure and Twitter censorship bolsters the argument that social-media platforms can be sued as “state actors” for restricting speech in violation of the First Amendment. Courts have been reluctant, and properly so, to allow such lawsuits to proceed without evidence linking specific demands from government officials to censorship.