4 ms·
Yes, I feel much safer if OpenAI and Google are the sole keepers of such technology. They have my and the publics best interest at heart.
by jackblemming 4y ago
Yes, I feel much safer if OpenAI and Google are the sole keepers of such technology. They have my and the publics best interest at heart.
- geraldwhen 4y agoIs this satire?
- pizza 4y agoYes
- ljlolel 4y agoGooglers and OpenAI legitimately believe this
- dkjaudyeqooe 4y agoSarcasm.
- PoignardAzur 4y agoLet me put it this way: it's not great to live in a world where the immense majority of nukes are controlled by Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. But it's arguably better than living in a world where every single citizen has a nuke. (Though the potential for harm of diffusion models is far below nuke; it's not "kill millions of people", it's "produce cheap disinformation and very convincing fake evidence to ruin someone's life")
- nightski 4y agoI think that would be a tough argument to make (in regards to image generation). The same could be said of just about any computing technology. The problem is we lose out on a lot of potential good. Either way it doesn't matter, you can't control bits like you can enriched uranium. It's just a matter of time. In the grand scheme of things Open AI will be irrelevant.