3 ms·
Despite ugly style, this is not a bug actually, assuming that error_intr is meaningful, and continue should be called only if error_intr is false: if (errno =
by maurycy 18y ago
Despite ugly style, this is not a bug actually, assuming that error_intr is meaningful, and continue should be called only if error_intr is false:
if (errno = error_intr) continue;
- pc 18y agoerror_intr is meaningful, but it's defined as the value of EINTR, which can never be zero -- so this is a bug.