2 ms·
Dude... you are conflating the national security risks from foreign actors accessing US citizen privacy data, with your concern about the risks of domestic surv
by howmayiannoyyou 4y ago
Dude... you are conflating the national security risks from foreign actors accessing US citizen privacy data, with your concern about the risks of domestic surveillance. Your comment is off-topic to mine and therefore whiney and immature.
> actual national security is held in trust with the Federal Government, and has provably failed to protect itself against serious compromise, as mentioned in my reply
Nat Sec folks have to be right all the time (impossible). Threats only have to get it right once. There have been failures and there will be more. If you think not hearing about successes means they aren't commonplace, then too bad for you that you never worked in Nat Sec or held a clearance. A lot of bad people have been taken off the playing field by USGOV and more will follow. But keep judging something you have no personal experience with.
- mistrial9 4y agoexactly - apologist for security state; anyone who criticizes "must be high" .. I could smell it; thx for the direct confirmation no "dude"