3 ms·
(IANAL) I wonder if there's a truth in advertising case here. Titan M is a security product, and is not meeting one of its promised security statements: > With
by cptcobalt 4y ago
(IANAL) I wonder if there's a truth in advertising case here. Titan M is a security product, and is not meeting one of its promised security statements:
> With the Pixel 3, we’ve increased our investment in security and put industry-leading hardware features into the device, so you can rest assured that your security and privacy are well protected. In the coming months, the security community will be able to audit Titan through its open-source firmware. In the meantime, you can test out Titan M and all of the smarts Pixel 3 brings, when it goes on sale on Thursday, October 18 in the U.S.
I can see a world where consumers/etc have purchased Pixel 3 specifically for that statement.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/topics/truth-advertising https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/topics/truth-advertising
- londons_explore 4y ago'months' could mean a million months... Also, Google could just offer a refund for the one customer who started the lawsuit.