>> It is not a big difference in geological time. When it was published we were 29.6 percent past the 243 year average cycle time. Now we are more than 32 perc

>> It is not a big difference in geological time. When it was published we were 29.6 percent past the 243 year average cycle time. Now we are more than 32 percent past. No, it's not a big difference but we are meaningfully further along than when it was written ;-)