I thought the castling section meant, not that they could castle multiple times, but that unlike normal chess they could still castle after moving the king as l

I thought the castling section meant, not that they could castle multiple times, but that unlike normal chess they could still castle after moving the king as long as it remained in the home row. You might very well be correct though. So I agree with the previous poster that there's too much ambiguity here. One thing I'd like to know is the ELO rating of the variant creator. Is this a game that someone who understands standard chess very well came up with and play-tested, or is it a game that someone with passing familiarity with chess thought of off the cuff? If the latter, the chances that the game is a well-balanced variant are not so high. Also, is "baring" a typo for "barring"? Finally it should be noted that dice chess is already a thing: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dice_chess https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dice_chess