5 ms·
>They're taking over everything. It looks like they've taken over a lot of the corporations. It looks like they've taken over the military. And it's just contin
by NoThisIsMe 4y ago
>They're taking over everything. It looks like they've taken over a lot of the corporations. It looks like they've taken over the military. And it's just continuing
Lmao. If only.
- inphovore 4y agoIt is a bit unintuitive for civilians to consider, yet the military is much more like a socialist organization than many are comfortable admitting. Housing and ration allowances Free health care for you and your family Better schools with newer, well maintained equipment Employees are actually indentured (contractual terms which essentially make these government “property”) Note I am both pro (lawful) military and NOT a socialist (I call myself a liberty minded conservationist hard-liner). I was however raised a military dependent (grew up traveling and living throughout the world!) I do recommend military service to those who aren’t quite sure their place in the world (airforce is a good branch for raising a family!) However I’m also a born and raised technology nerd and make ridiculously more income as a civilian. The military actually needs technologists. They’re desperate.
- toomuchtodo 4y agoThat sounds communist, not socialist, due to the housing and food rations, command structure, and depending on your enlistment agreement, inability to separate at will from the org. Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
- slively 4y agoIf the military were socialist, it would be controlled by the workers, but instead it’s very authoritarian where the front line employees have no say. This seems to confuse welfare and benefits with socialism.
- inphovore 4y agoWhich is an example of socialism where workers actually control anything? While my example may not be entirely text book accurate, I only hear of socialists speaking as you say (advocating fairness as a principle.) Impressions of working socialism are of a committee deciding who gets what (and what is in everyone’s best interests). The example might very well be an authoritarian form of socialism, though not really trying to mince words, only to reveal that sometimes working systems we are familiar with actually work outside of the conventions we expect. There are quite a few socialists who I respect (altruistic intellectuals), though few (0) working examples.