3 ms·
> > The 2nd order effect may be in 5s time > how is that not long term thinking? What does "long term" mean to you ... 5s (i.e. 5 seconds) is pretty short ter
by Ensorceled 4y ago
> > The 2nd order effect may be in 5s time
> how is that not long term thinking?
What does "long term" mean to you ... 5s (i.e. 5 seconds) is pretty short term to me.
- rob_c 4y agoLong term being further down the line, i.e. net result in 5 years is still the same regardless of how quickly things evolve. I'd argue that because happens in 5min that's an immediate effect regardless of if it happens after something or not. How is there any higher order evolution to that? Are you trying to argue that people can't cope with time in a plan therefore it must be a higher order thinking to understand the rapid evolution of something?
- thfuran 4y agoNo, time has nothing to do with it, only the length of the causal chain. That's why it's not really "long term" thinking even if higher order effects might sometimes not be felt immediately.