4 ms·
I don't think that "it doesn't always kill or seriously maim a child - there are numerous examples where it didn't" is as powerful an argument as you think it i
by orlp 4y ago
I don't think that "it doesn't always kill or seriously maim a child - there are numerous examples where it didn't" is as powerful an argument as you think it is.
- mlindner 4y ago> it doesn't always kill or seriously maim a child - there are numerous examples where it didn't Don't intentionally misquote me to twist my argument. Give me an example where it did actually kill or seriously maim a child. Also you don't get to automatically ignore all the children that were saved from inattentive drivers by this system. It works even when autopilot is inactive.
- orlp 4y ago> Also you don't get to automatically ignore all the children that were saved from inattentive drivers by this system. You are right about this of course, I just found the wording quite strange.
- kaba0 4y agoAnd is available in a low-end suzuki at the fraction of the price. I am all for computer-assisted breaking, but I hate the mislabeling of tesla’s featureset as FSD, as that’s just a scam.
- mlindner 4y agoIt can do long distance self driving runs with zero takeovers, just not every time yet. I wouldn't call it a scam just because it's not working perfectly yet. See this video for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pf37o-cKOMs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pf37o-cKOMs