3 ms·
Ideally, it would always stop. The fact that sometimes it sometimes stops before hitting a child is not completely comforting.
by Planktonne 4y ago
Ideally, it would always stop.
The fact that sometimes it sometimes stops before hitting a child is not completely comforting.
- Etheryte 4y agoI don't think ideally is the right mindset to have here. So long as it does better than a human driver and/or better than the current status quo, it's already a great improvement. Of course things can always be better, but just because it isn't ideal doesn't mean it's bad.
- Planktonne 4y ago> So long as it does better than a human driver and/or better than the current status quo, it's already a great improvement. I've yet to see evidence that this is the case. In this particular situation, it's hard to believe that a human driver would have struggled.