3 ms·
What’s outrageous is how they only hold 30 shared passwords but somehow billed us $1500 a year to use a browser plugin to serve 20 kilobytes of data to 12 peopl
by what-imright 4y ago
What’s outrageous is how they only hold 30 shared passwords but somehow billed us $1500 a year to use a browser plugin to serve 20 kilobytes of data to 12 people.
- moritonal 4y agoYou choose to use Laspass rather than any of the free solutions because of its ease. Your problem is you gave 30 critical pieces of information to a third-party without any backup solution.
- what-imright 4y agoYes, it is our fault for trusting them ultimately. Agreed
- hampereddustbin 4y agoI'm not quite sure I understand, isn't there a written contract you sign that states exactly what you get for N amount of money? Paying extra because of insufficient planning sucks, but is the price of such luxury. Think of the bright side; it's a good thing this bit your company at this early stage and not with half a million dollar contracts.
- psychphysic 4y agoCheap lesson as corporate lessons go.
- hampereddustbin 4y agoThis is honestly a tough thing with other cloud-based solutions aswell. Backing up your data from say AWS isn't difficult _per se_, it's just made prohibitively expensive to export any serious amount of data
- boomboomsubban 4y ago"What's outrageous is how they do exactly what they said they would for the price we accepted." What did you expect from them? The refusal to provide access without renewal is scummy, but this complaint is silly.