5 ms·
This was a review of the author's earlier paper of 2018, in which they were actually claiming a proof of RH. On their arXiv page: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12
by Quant10 4y ago
This was a review of the author's earlier paper of 2018, in which they were actually claiming a proof of RH.
On their arXiv page: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12546 https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12546, the author states that "though all my previous proposed (dis)proofs were flawed, i think the flaws pointed me towards the right direction."