4 ms·

would you, please, un-dupe it? This is different thing

• pvg 4y ago
  You should write this up in some more detail maybe and then just post a link to your writeup. It seems you are saying something about a thing reported two years ago and it'd make more sense if you explained why you think 'it's back', why it's important, etc. That way you also don't have the problem of links not working in a text-only post. Although keep in mind a minor already-covered Zoom thing (if that's what you happen to have, not if not, of course) right after a big Zoom thread on a current Zoom thing is still within the greater Dupe Metropolitan Area.
  • nuker 4y ago
    I wrote this up, here, not in a blog. The post and the first comment together. Less is more. But the comment was moved by dang to another thread, and got separated from this. I honestly do not see the sense of any of this happening, given the thread had already 100+ votes.
• dang 4y ago
  Oops - sorry! I've un-duped it now. (I'm afraid the comments that were here before are now a little hard to un-merge—but IIRC they were mostly pretty generic about Zoom etc., and thus ok to live in the other thread.)