> the attackers have that information and could have looked it up if they didn't. The Tweet was clearly not written by the attacker... The attacker did reply w

> the attackers have that information and could have looked it up if they didn't. The Tweet was clearly not written by the attacker... The attacker did reply with the exact model of the device later on. Trying to figure out what you're looking at while live-tweeting a presentation isn't exactly easy. Us farmers might have recognized it right away, but the CEO of iFixit is decidedly not a farmer. These are not common devices outside of niche uses. If you want detailed information, maybe don't turn to something that is being reported as it is happening through a short messaging service? > all I am trying to say is that "jailbroken a John Deere" makes zero sense on its own, and doesn't convey any useful information on its own. It might not make sense on its own, but it wasn't stated on its own. It accompanied photos of the device in question. You know full well from context what "John Deere" means in this case; at very least you can discern it is some kind of computing device made by John Deere. The "Turns out our entire food system is built on outdated, unpatched Linux and Windows CE hardware with LTE modems." part of the Tweet was far more ridiculous.