3 ms·
In this context, I think one can assume some high level of commonality between the implementation of the security of the different John Deere products. So, phra
by nomel 4y ago
In this context, I think one can assume some high level of commonality between the implementation of the security of the different John Deere products. So, phrasing it as a group makes some sense.
- naikrovek 4y ago
- jjeaff 4y agoLack of detail doesn't make something wrong. You are the one who is wrong here. Is English perhaps not your first language? I'm having trouble imagining how a native speaker could think referring to a specific tractor as "a John Deere" is somehow incorrect English.
- naikrovek 4y ago
- dmitriid 4y ago> Then why is the singular “a” used? Because that's how English works. You can drive a Tesla, own an Andy Warhol, and jailbreak a John Deere.
- naikrovek 4y agoTesla makes one thing: automobiles. Andy Warhol made one thing: paintings. John Deere makes many things: tractors, lawn mowers, displays, harvester combines, excavators, and many more things, including stuff that works in non-john Deere vehicles. "jailbreak a John Deere what"
- dmitriid 4y ago> Andy Warhol made one thing: paintings. Andy Warhol made: - paintings - photos - collages - marketing illustrations - films > "jailbreak a John Deere what" Doesn't matter. And doesn't make it improper English.
- orf 4y agoTesla make more things than a car. It’s not normal to get this worked up about something you are so clearly wrong about and is so insignificant. It’s also so bizarrely pedantic that this whole thread is hilarious. You need to chill. “Chill what? It doesn’t make any sense! How can anyone understand that!! How does my core body temperature have any bearing in the point I’m desperately trying to make about how I don’t understand colloquialisms!!!”
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]