3 ms·
While in cryptography there is never 100% we tend to expect crypto not to have have serious known flaws and require great amounts of compute power, time and ene
by SXX 4y ago
While in cryptography there is never 100% we tend to expect crypto not to have have serious known flaws and require great amounts of compute power, time and energy for brute-force attack. E.g cryptocurrency is "safe" because cost of attack is too high and require too much resources.
On other side this Sony Camera-DRM is not just useless, but dangerous especially since Sony have well established track record with backdoors and cryptography:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootkit_scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootk...
https://www.engadget.com/2010-12-29-hackers-obtain-ps3-private-cryptography-key-due-to-epic-programm.html https://www.engadget.com/2010-12-29-hackers-obtain-ps3-priva...
https://www.pcworld.com/article/411221/backdoor-accounts-found-in-80-sony-ip-security-camera-models.html https://www.pcworld.com/article/411221/backdoor-accounts-fou...
- lazide 4y agoNone of what you’re saying appears to be pertinent in this issue, since the primary objections appear to not be related to the crypto but to the end-to-end validation? Which it’s still likely better than the current situation, which is photoshops ahoy everywhere.