> mypy is laughably primitive compared to advanced static typing systems I don't disagree, but that's not an argument I ever put forth! (and I actually sort of

> mypy is laughably primitive compared to advanced static typing systems I don't disagree, but that's not an argument I ever put forth! (and I actually sort of disagree a little bit, mypy has/is getting a bunch of really cool powerful features that put it in the realm of "as cool as" those languages: PEPs 544, 586, 591, 647 (this is a weak form of contract types!), 675 (~constexpr string type), 646 (variadic generic/numeric dependent types!))