3 ms·

Unless you take a picture of a picture.

• karamanolev 4y ago
  Then you're proving the picture you just photographed existed and looked like it did. Where are you going with this? The utility of knowing a photograph was captured as-is should be know, as should be the ways to physically manipulate things so you capture what you want. IMO the question here should be if 1) this is the best solution for those use cases and 2) if this is implemented in a technically competent way.
  • rafale 4y ago
    I meant the end viewer will not notice it was a picture of a picture of a mountain but will rather think it's a picture of a mountain. Perhaps thinking it's an original work. Under perfect conditions, it's very hard to tell the difference