3 ms·
The goal is to prove that you took an image of something that existed in the state it was photographed in. If you take a picture of a fake passport, you are "pr
by karamanolev 4y ago
The goal is to prove that you took an image of something that existed in the state it was photographed in. If you take a picture of a fake passport, you are "proving" this passport existed and looked like it did on the picture. So ... mission accomplished?
If they do it competently (or if it can be done) is a separate matter.
- rafale 4y agoUnless you take a picture of a picture.
- karamanolev 4y agoThen you're proving the picture you just photographed existed and looked like it did. Where are you going with this? The utility of knowing a photograph was captured as-is should be know, as should be the ways to physically manipulate things so you capture what you want. IMO the question here should be if 1) this is the best solution for those use cases and 2) if this is implemented in a technically competent way.
- rafale 4y agoI meant the end viewer will not notice it was a picture of a picture of a mountain but will rather think it's a picture of a mountain. Perhaps thinking it's an original work. Under perfect conditions, it's very hard to tell the difference