2 ms·

Someone reviewed that specific paper here [1]. [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20220128195023/https://motls.blogspot.com/2019/10/some-fun-with-proof-of-riemann

• Quant10 4y ago
  This was a review of the author's earlier paper of 2018, in which they were actually claiming a proof of the RH. On their arXiv page: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12546 https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12546, the author states that "though all my previous proposed (dis)proofs were flawed, i think the flaws pointed me towards the right direction..."