3 ms·
Someone did a review of his previous work on Riemann hypothesis [1]. Not into this field, but apparently that blog is being run by someone credible [2]. I have
by kklisura 4y ago
Someone did a review of his previous work on Riemann hypothesis [1]. Not into this field, but apparently that blog is being run by someone credible [2]. I have found a link to [1] via this forum [3].
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20220128195023/https://motls.blogspot.com/2019/10/some-fun-with-proof-of-riemann.html https://web.archive.org/web/20220128195023/https://motls.blo...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lubo%C5%A1_Motl https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lubo%C5%A1_Motl
[3] https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/124368-has-the-riemann-hypothesis-has-been-proved-here/ https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/124368-has-the-riemann-h...
- Quant10 4y agoThis was a review of the author's earlier paper of 2018, in which they were actually claiming a proof of RH. On their arXiv page: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12546 https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12546, the author states that "though all my previous proposed (dis)proofs were flawed, i think the flaws pointed me towards the right direction."