3 ms·
So you couldn’t find any precedent I take it. That article proves exactly my point: > emojis can raise potentially complex and serious legal issues, including
by jjcon 4y ago
So you couldn’t find any precedent I take it. That article proves exactly my point:
> emojis can raise potentially complex and serious legal issues, including novel and complicated questions about intellectual property
> copyright might protect individual emojis
So the question is far more open ended and complicated than your snide “So I guess all copyright is pointless” remark would make it seem. The complexity of the law is exactly what I was getting at. How much change is required to make it no longer Apple IP since the underlying emoji determinations are not even made by Apple, just adopted by them?