3 ms·
Very well said, thanks. After you do 90% of the work, you have to do the other 90%.
by UIUC_06 4y ago
Very well said, thanks. After you do 90% of the work, you have to do the other 90%.
- ncmncm 4y agoOr, in this case, the other 90000%. This result does not bring us any nearer to civil energy production via fusion.
- quickthrower2 4y agoGood old fusion! Under such pressure. Does JWST have to result in a commercial application?
- UIUC_06 4y agoI think the general hostility is a reaction to the hype that "this breakthrough means we're closer to an infinite source of cheap, clean energy." It clearly does not. I can understand the researchers feeling unable to tell the press, "Look, this is just basic research. Like the JWST." It might lead to a massive reaction that "well, then you have to just get in line for those basic research dollars, instead of being a top-priority thing we throw money at." All those research dollars they'd be giving up!
- jjk166 4y agoThe JWST cost about 3 times as much as the NIF. The annual budget for the NIF is about the cost of 6 F-35s, which the US is acquiring 152 of in FY2022. It's not getting top-priority money.
- UIUC_06 4y agoOK, I don't think comparing research to the defense budget is at all useful, but comparing JWST research to fusion research IS. So I'll stand corrected on US money. However, ITER is a global effort, so it isn't just the US budgets we have to consider, right?