4 ms·
You could try reading the article and commenting with your own original thoughts.
by rubiquity 4y ago
You could try reading the article and commenting with your own original thoughts.
- xcambar 4y agoWhat makes you assume I did not read? How shocking is it that, on some article and topic, I do not have a comment I deem interesting enough to share? Besides, if you do not appreciate my specificly off-topic contribution, then so be it.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- xiande04 4y ago> What makes you assume I did not read? OP didn't say you didn't read it. They said that you didn't read it AND attempt to start a meaningful discussion about it, which exactly what you were complaining about, right?
- xcambar 4y agoIf you mean meaningful with regards to the topic, I'd agree with you and knew it from the start, hence the "off-topic" warning. My intention was to confront my experience and behavior (towards certain categories of posts of high upvotes/comment ratio) with the rest of the HN crowd, in a contextualized environment where it applies. I'm sorry that the conversation now revolves around my own comment. Kinda ironic.
- kordlessagain 4y agoAll you need are logs. Also, https://honeycomb.io https://honeycomb.io looks pretty dope.
- metadat 4y agoThe honeycomb-dot-io case was bad, I attended their conference once and it was like I'd been suckered into a neverending timeshare sales tour. Thankfully I haven't noticed the domain on the frontpage lately. Compare: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=honeycomb.io https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=honeycomb.io https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=metaplane.dev https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=metaplane.dev Both look like they want to game HN pretty hard. If only they'd publish actual novel or interesting information instead of thinly veiled SaaS marketing!