I would argue this doesn't belong here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Lerner https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Lerner Advocating perpetual motion is obvi

I would argue this doesn't belong here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Lerner https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Lerner Advocating perpetual motion is obviously out of bounds, interesting heterdox-to-heretic physics can be fun, but this article is crankery unbalanced by the perspective of anything in the mainstream. I would rule it on the perpetual-motion side of the line of crap no one needs to waste time reading.