3 ms·
Maybe if you define AI to be “technology that could plausibly lead to AGI”, but everything in this book is still terrifically relevant for many practical “how t
by tel 4y ago
Maybe if you define AI to be “technology that could plausibly lead to AGI”, but everything in this book is still terrifically relevant for many practical “how to get my computer to solve this semi-open ended search problem efficiently”. Which is far from uncommon.
- dllthomas 4y ago> “technology that could plausibly lead to AGI” My AI prof joked, I think, that it was "things that don't work yet" - clearly only a humanlike AI could do OCR... until it started working, etc. But I actually think your hypothetically proposed definition fits the history even better.