2 ms·
At a minimum, because there is very little political appetite for it (apart from left-wing urban professionals) in large part because it’s an insanely inefficie
by throwaway894345 4y ago
At a minimum, because there is very little political appetite for it (apart from left-wing urban professionals) in large part because it’s an insanely inefficient way to meet climate goals (compared with building out clean energy sources and electrifying fossil fuel
applications like cars), but also because it’s insanely invasive (it requires pushing everyone into a lifestyle they don’t want).