3 ms·
You're comparing brand new cargo bikes to used cars. The real comparision would be a new cargo bike (2-5k) vs a new car (>40k). You're making the assumption th
by occz 4y ago
You're comparing brand new cargo bikes to used cars. The real comparision would be a new cargo bike (2-5k) vs a new car (>40k).
You're making the assumption that the cargo bike seats only one person, when a parent could easily seat two children on a cargo bike.
You're making the assumption that everyone would be using the cargo bike as their primary day-to-day transportation, when the cargo bike is mostly useful for either transporting young children, or when transporting cargo. At other times a more reasonable choice would be to use a regular bicycle.
You're making the assumption that cargo bikes take up as much space as cars which is just downright false.
- LunaSea 4y agoNew cars don't cost $40k in the real world. Also, there is close to no second hand cargo bike volume so it is absolutely a fair comparison. If I want to buy a vehicle I don't care if second hand cargo bikes are available or not. I know that second hand cars so exist though.
- petriw 4y agoIt is much better to view cars as a yearly cost, or a per mile cost. Most people don't pay $40k up front, instead they pay $4k to $10k per year for a new car.