3 ms·
Yes, they could've come up with one or two sentences that appealed to the emotion and pushed the reader to a custom url relating to this issue. Or even an exagg
by thomasgerbe 15y ago
Yes, they could've come up with one or two sentences that appealed to the emotion and pushed the reader to a custom url relating to this issue. Or even an exaggerated screenshot of what could happen if the bill passes.
Ah well. Rational writeups are all fine and good but not when you probably have a split second to capture the attention with an ad.
- lancewiggs 15y agoIt's aimed at the committee members, not the average punter, and it is serious because an emotional non-fact-based driven approach would backfire. The NYTimes location hints at the power they have to do more.