4 ms·
None of that matters. The problem is the "without warning" part.
by 18amxn18 4y ago
None of that matters. The problem is the "without warning" part.
- toomuchtodo 4y agoThere is no contractual obligation to provide notice.
- 18amxn18 4y agoAgain, it doesn't matter. No serious provider will ban customers without a fair warning. Same as Namecheap when it ended services for Russian customers with a 6-day notice.
- bobkazamakis 4y ago>No serious provider will ban customers without a fair warning I'm sure no serious customer is within this group as far as they're concerned
- semiquaver 4y agoExactly. “It doesn’t matter” is what Mailchimp would say to former customers who are unhappy that they have been deprived of a vector to perpetuate Ponzi schemes. And to the tiny fraction of crypto businesses that can’t be fairly described this way, I’m sure it’s not the first time that being part of a largely criminal and fraudulent sector has had this sort of consequence.
- semiquaver 4y agoThey had plenty of warning, their businesses have been prohibited by Mailchimp since at least early 2018. Expecting a company to give notice before enforcing its long-established policy is not realistic. > Some industries have higher-than-average abuse complaints, which can jeopardize the deliverability of our entire system. Nothing personal, but in order to maintain the highest delivery rates possible for all our customers, we can’t allow businesses that offer these types of services, products, or content: > >[...] > > Also, we cannot allow businesses involved in any aspect of the sale, transaction, exchange, storage, marketing or production of cryptocurrencies, virtual currencies, and any digital assets related to an Initial Coin Offering, to use MailChimp to facilitate or support any of those activities. https://web.archive.org/web/20180403195541/https://mailchimp.com/legal/acceptable_use/ https://web.archive.org/web/20180403195541/https://mailchimp...