Climate change is no longer about the environment, and that is why we see so much movement now. I would argue PFAS isn't about damaging the environment either.

Climate change is no longer about the environment, and that is why we see so much movement now. I would argue PFAS isn't about damaging the environment either. It's about human health. Same goes for CFCs. It is getting problematic that 'being green' these days can either be caring about the environment and biodiversity like green-peace. Or it can mean 'doing whatever is needed to stop climate change and keep harmful (to humans) chemicals out of the environment'. Those are actually two very different thought processes with different people who support them. Sharing the term is not working out very well.