4 ms·
The question was more about the distinction wrt AI I think. I understood the original comment to argue that it can't be sentient because its only created by in
by 411111111111111 4y ago
The question was more about the distinction wrt AI I think.
I understood the original comment to argue that it can't be sentient because its only created by ingesting insane amounts of human interactions.
Though I doubt we'll see artificial sentience during my lifetime, i strongly disagree with that take. From my point of view Humans need that too to become smart and learn language etc, so that shouldn't be an argument. Neither for nor against.
- nl 4y agoI thought their point was that there was an attempt to hide the use of data. I don't agree with that point at all either.