4 ms·
> There is nothing inherently wrong with landlords and rent. Anyone that says otherwise is a tankie. Landlords provide a valuable service. What valuable servic
by andrepd 4y ago
> There is nothing inherently wrong with landlords and rent. Anyone that says otherwise is a tankie. Landlords provide a valuable service.
What valuable service would that be, I wonder. Having a signature on a deed?
Also nice, argument: "my opinion is right and anyone that says otherwise is wrong". x)
- dmarlow 4y agoIt takes considerable effort and funds to keep a house not just livable, but well kept, insured, managed, etc. If not for landlords, how else would all of that happen?
- SantalBlush 4y agoPlenty of landlords out there don't take care of these things.
- dmarlow 4y agoAbsolutely! But plenty do. How many tenants out there don't hold up their end of things?
- sys_64738 4y agoHousing for a fee for a fixed term. There is inherent risk being a landlord that renters don't face.
- metadat 4y agoSee the definition of landlord and compare it to that of a slumlord. > slum·lord (n) > a landlord of slum property, especially one who profiteers. "Can you rent to the poor without being a slumlord?"