Sorry, this is a strawman argument. You just claim without proof that all of these people have no problem with some random right and therefore the argument is d

Sorry, this is a strawman argument. You just claim without proof that all of these people have no problem with some random right and therefore the argument is disingenuous? There are definitely people that don't think a right to a free attorney should be a right. There are also people who think that it's okay for this to exist but doesn't necessarily correspond to the same level of a right as a negative right like free speech. These are entirely consistent positions to hold.