3 ms·

>Well, sure. But since we're here, talking about neonazis You're begging the question. They're edgy conservatives, clearly. Neo-Nazis? Show me. I object to a b

by _9xrb 4y ago

>Well, sure. But since we're here, talking about neonazis You're begging the question. They're edgy conservatives, clearly. Neo-Nazis? Show me. I object to a blinkered political hypersensitivity that permits on the one hand violent, authoritarian tendencies if you're far enough left, and bans on the other hand anyone right of Bill Clinton. I think it's unhealthy for the FOSS community and tech as a whole. >and we disagree with neonazism (right, deepdiver?) And we don't beat our wives. Right, gtsop?

gtsop 4y ago
> They're edgy conservatives, clearly. Neo-Nazis? Show me Everything was in the links, no need to re-iterate. > And we don't beat our wives. Right, gtsop? I don't, can't speak for others. Dodging a question with another one won't cut it though. Seems like it's extremely hard for you to even suggest neonazism is remotely bad. First you see nothing of substance to suckless' activity and then you make references of the far left to somehow balance out the existence of neonazis. I wonder what your arguments would be was it not for the for the far left existing.
- _9xrb 4y ago
  Your posturing as commissar, judge, and high inquisitor is as comical as it is repulsive. It is exactly why I commented in the first place, and a type of bad behavior I will always push against. Demonstrating that it is possible to disagree with and even ignore rhetoric like yours is important to the health of an open society.
  - gtsop 4y ago
    I have to give it to you, your tactics are great. You keep reframing the conversation to plant a convinient enemy against you, gifting your arguments a false sense of ethical superiority. E.g: you frame me as a commissar while you talk of an healthy open society (making it look like you have the moral high ground), however i never possed as a commissar and the only instance of your "open society" talk was when you renamed "hitler's house name" to "edgy" and saw nothing wrong. Disagreeing and conversing is a necessity to humankind. You say my rhetoric is bad, I say yours is, let history decide.

by _9xrb 4y ago

gtsop 4y ago

> They're edgy conservatives, clearly. Neo-Nazis? Show me Everything was in the links, no need to re-iterate. > And we don't beat our wives. Right, gtsop? I don't, can't speak for others. Dodging a question with another one won't cut it though. Seems like it's extremely hard for you to even suggest neonazism is remotely bad. First you see nothing of substance to suckless' activity and then you make references of the far left to somehow balance out the existence of neonazis. I wonder what your arguments would be was it not for the for the far left existing.

_9xrb 4y ago
Your posturing as commissar, judge, and high inquisitor is as comical as it is repulsive. It is exactly why I commented in the first place, and a type of bad behavior I will always push against. Demonstrating that it is possible to disagree with and even ignore rhetoric like yours is important to the health of an open society.
- gtsop 4y ago
  I have to give it to you, your tactics are great. You keep reframing the conversation to plant a convinient enemy against you, gifting your arguments a false sense of ethical superiority. E.g: you frame me as a commissar while you talk of an healthy open society (making it look like you have the moral high ground), however i never possed as a commissar and the only instance of your "open society" talk was when you renamed "hitler's house name" to "edgy" and saw nothing wrong. Disagreeing and conversing is a necessity to humankind. You say my rhetoric is bad, I say yours is, let history decide.