3 ms·

Actually it doesn't matter how many times it has been verified working properly. One single failure would be more than enough...

• imgabe 4y ago
  Hmm, has there been one single failure of a human driver hitting a child?
  • Brian_K_White 4y ago
    That is the difference between an accident and murder. If you try your best to adhere to all best practices, and still a bad thing happens, that is an entirely 100% different thing from the bad thing that happens when you voluntarily, deliberately, knowingly, do something wrong or unnecessary, and then a bad thing happens.
    • imgabe 4y ago
      So the AI driver knowingly, deliberately decides to murder children?
      • Brian_K_White 4y ago
        get a new pharmacist
        • imgabe 4y ago
          I’m not the one hallucinating that AI acts with deliberate malicious intent. Maybe you should get that checked out.
          • Brian_K_White 4y ago
            I didn't say or even imply any ai had any intent. We're talking about whoever wants to stick a kid in front of a car, not the car. Holy cow.
            • imgabe 4y ago
              That's not what I was talking about. I was responding to the person who implied that self-driving cars need to be completely error-free, which is an unattainable standard, and far beyond what human drivers are capable of. There will still be traffic accidents with self-driving cars, but hopefully far fewer. Holding them to an unrealistic standard of 0 errors would needlessly kill thousands of people. It's pretty clear that nobody was ever going to put a kid in front of their Tesla, and The Verge and everyone here is being deliberately obtuse to indulge their Tesla/Musk hate.