4 ms·
The car would know otherwise. It has to be real or the car won't take the exercise seriously.
by superchroma 4y ago
The car would know otherwise. It has to be real or the car won't take the exercise seriously.
- dieselgate 4y agoThis is sarcasm and not actually true right? Presumably a full self driving car wouldn't run into a stray shopping cart in the parking lot
- superchroma 4y agoYes, it's humor.
- Lendal 4y agoEven if the AI could tell the difference between a cardboard cutout and a human, I still wouldn't want my car to run over a cardboard cutout, or a box, or anything else on the road. I don't trust it because I know first-hand that Tesla FSD consistently runs over both large pieces of debris and large potholes in the roadway that every other vehicle on the road avoids. So yeah, I don't trust the car is smart enough to avoid hitting anything other than another vehicle or bicyclist. I don't rely on it at all. It was a waste of $10,000. After two years' experience with FSD, I absolutely would not buy FSD again if I were buying another Tesla right now. But I still don't believe it's something for lawmakers to get involved in.
- superchroma 4y agoPersonally I wouldn't be relying on a car not to hit anything at all, at least, not in this decade. To me, it seems like a last chance dice roll, to lean on the scales a bit and maybe help in a case where I mess up.