4 ms·
Why would you use a real child? That's so dumb
by tsol 4y ago
Why would you use a real child? That's so dumb
- superchroma 4y agoThe car would know otherwise. It has to be real or the car won't take the exercise seriously.
- dieselgate 4y agoThis is sarcasm and not actually true right? Presumably a full self driving car wouldn't run into a stray shopping cart in the parking lot
- superchroma 4y agoYes, it's humor.
- Lendal 4y agoEven if the AI could tell the difference between a cardboard cutout and a human, I still wouldn't want my car to run over a cardboard cutout, or a box, or anything else on the road. I don't trust it because I know first-hand that Tesla FSD consistently runs over both large pieces of debris and large potholes in the roadway that every other vehicle on the road avoids. So yeah, I don't trust the car is smart enough to avoid hitting anything other than another vehicle or bicyclist. I don't rely on it at all. It was a waste of $10,000. After two years' experience with FSD, I absolutely would not buy FSD again if I were buying another Tesla right now. But I still don't believe it's something for lawmakers to get involved in.
- superchroma 4y agoPersonally I wouldn't be relying on a car not to hit anything at all, at least, not in this decade. To me, it seems like a last chance dice roll, to lean on the scales a bit and maybe help in a case where I mess up.