"It's not a philosophical question whether we live in an environment where objects are flawed. Around that are representing extraterrestrial technologies." I c

"It's not a philosophical question whether we live in an environment where objects are flawed. Around that are representing extraterrestrial technologies." I can't make sense of these sentences. And the spelling mistakes are helping either. "Today [Galileo Galilei] would have been canceled on social media." For what exactly? And his this guy not seen the quality of social media commentary? The bar is loooow. Spectacular but unfounded claims are a mundanity and it's worrying that he's mixing these culture warrior talking points with science. "Once I realized that we found an object from a technological origin that was produced elsewhere." Unfounded spectacular claims just like this. The object is interstellar maybe, but where has he shown evidence of a technological origin? This is pretty important. How is it just left unchallenged? It's a weird article. The video looks like a shot from The Thunderbirds and it reads like something from a local station affiliate run twice through translation software.