4 ms·
This seems to be a complete re-writing of the facts revealed from eye witness and video accounts of the events of that evening. The jury also seems to disagree
by Alupis 4y ago
This seems to be a complete re-writing of the facts revealed from eye witness and video accounts of the events of that evening. The jury also seems to disagree with this alternate narrative.
It may be what some folks want to believe happened, but it is absolutely not the facts.
- bb88 4y ago> The jury also seems to disagree with this alternate narrative. The prosecution couldn't bring to the stand the people he killed -- because they were dead.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- vkou 4y ago> The jury also seems to disagree with this alternate narrative. The jury decided that Rittenhouse acted in self-defense. That finding is not inconsistent with anything I said. The whole problem of firing off guns in a crowd is that everyone involved might be acting in self-defense, and yet still end up killing eachother. Life isn't a video game, or an action movie. You can't always tell who the 'bad guy' is, or even if there is one.
- Alupis 4y agoPeople do not defend themselves by chasing after and repeatedly attacking a stranger.
- vkou 4y agoPeople absolutely have and occasionally do rush active shooters, which is what happened in the second part of the situation. And if you don't ever believe that confronting an active shooter is ever the correct thing to do, why do you think having a gun will help you? Take your own advice and run away, you don't need a gun to do that.