The Twitter post in question (https://twitter.com/wholemarsblog/status/1557112809132945408 https://twitter.com/wholemarsblog/status/1557112809132945408) says “(

The Twitter post in question (https://twitter.com/wholemarsblog/status/1557112809132945408 https://twitter.com/wholemarsblog/status/1557112809132945408) says “(this is a serious request)”. Fine, then let’s treat it like a serious request. Apparently someone volunteered a child (https://twitter.com/wholemarsblog/status/1557206098876194816 https://twitter.com/wholemarsblog/status/1557206098876194816, presumably their own child). Has this (pseudonymous) person done a proper study workup? This is a proposal to put a child into a potentially life-threatening situation. I hope they’ve written up (and had reviewed) the rationale for why this can’t be simulated first. And I hope they’ve gotten the snapshot of the Tesla software used, for reference. And for the person who volunteered their own child, I wonder if they should be talking to CPS right now. The person who made the Twitter post mentioned the Bay Area. If they are serious, try going to a place like the Center for Automotive Research at Stanford, talking to the people there, and doing a study.