3 ms·
If you can build Objective-S in a language then isn't the language that contains the set of Objective-S and other languages in theory more general purpose? I'm
by EddySchauHai 4y ago
If you can build Objective-S in a language then isn't the language that contains the set of Objective-S and other languages in theory more general purpose? I'm not sure I get the definition.
- yellowapple 4y agoI guess it's the same question as whether the ability to implement an Erlang VM in C makes C a functional and/or concurrency-oriented language.
- User23 4y agoC is a functional language[1]. That’s one of the finer examples of Haha, Only Serious I’ve seen for programming. [1] http://conal.net/blog/posts/the-c-language-is-purely-functional http://conal.net/blog/posts/the-c-language-is-purely-functio...