I'm confused what you're even arguing against. The article specifically uses the phrasing "uses off-the-shelf parts that cost around $25". It doesn't say anyth

I'm confused what you're even arguing against. The article specifically uses the phrasing "uses off-the-shelf parts that cost around $25". It doesn't say anything about the cost to develop, it doesn't say anything even slightly misleading or ambiguous about this. Like, what should the article have done instead? How could it possibly be clearer and more explicit about what $25 referred to here?