3 ms·
The documents you linked doesn't says what you say. The risk table nicely show it: all renewable are red. Yes, 100% nuclear is not achievable without risk,
by Kuinox 4y ago
The documents you linked doesn't says what you say.
The risk table nicely show it: all renewable are red.
Yes, 100% nuclear is not achievable without risk, but with less risk than the 50% renewable you are proning.
- it_citizen 4y agoPage 26: > The study concludes, without any ambiguity, that a sustained development of electrical renewable energies is essential in France to respect its climate commitments. Which defacto exclude a 100% nuclear mix. I am not proning anything. To be honest, I would have been happy if the report said that 100% nuclear is the best way to go. I have no problem with the tech. Are you talking about the risk table p43? That table shows that n2 and n03 are probably more achievable than the other scenarios but nowhere that table proves that more nuclear than n03 would be achievable in the timeframe allocated. I would love an exact quote or reference on that.