Do not misquote. The direct quote is right there. "There are many journals which would be interested in publishing a well-argued synthesis of existing evidenc

Do not misquote. The direct quote is right there. "There are many journals which would be interested in publishing a well-argued synthesis of existing evidence against the standard hot big bang interpretation. But MNRAS, with its focus on publication of significant new astronomical results, is not one of them." This isn't rejection of a PR based on merit, it's selectively refusing to review a PR.