I believe you've misunderstood the parent comment. Also - generally speaking, I think being able to speak (or write) in a manner that's compelling for audience

I believe you've misunderstood the parent comment. Also - generally speaking, I think being able to speak (or write) in a manner that's compelling for audiences across broad backgrounds, rather than just their niche community is a skillset to be admired. Science does nothing if people do not believe in it, or do not engage with it. I definitely agree that this does not give academics license to veer entirely outside of their expertise and use their credentials in the field to hide this (eg: Diamond). But I think not trying at all is worse. Far worse.