4 ms·
They’ve got as much right to be there as you do! > taking pictures with one in the background without consent They don’t need your consent!
by chrisseaton 4y ago
They’ve got as much right to be there as you do!
> taking pictures with one in the background without consent
They don’t need your consent!
- MichaelCollins 4y agoHow to make people like you: "The law doesn't forbid me from doing this to you!" Right up there with "I'm not touching you!"
- thaumasiotes 4y agoWell, yes. I'm not touching you right now. And if you're offended by that, you are being egregiously unreasonable. Exactly the same is true of the picture-taking "concern".
- ghaff 4y agoIt's one thing to shove a camera in someone's face. It's another for people to have any reasonable expectation of not getting into even the background of a photo when walking down a city street or in some other busy place.
- chrisseaton 4y agoYou’re not ‘doing’ anything to someone by taking a photo in public with them in the background. You don’t have reasonable expectations and it’s fine for reasonable people to disregard them.
- alistairSH 4y agoThey’ve got as much right to be there as you do! Can do vs Should do. Yes, you can stand in the middle of a narrow path and use a selfie stick to take photos. No, you shouldn't do that if it inconveniences everybody around you. Doing so anyways makes you a self-centered dickhead.